“I think part of what we’ve seen is confusion on the part of the market sometimes in terms of what the overall direction [of the rescue package] might be. And we want to make sure that we’re providing as much clarity as possible.”
-President-elect Barack Obama, Nov. 24, 2008.
It seems to Wonk the Plank that the latest bailout – Citigroup, this time – does the exact opposite. It admits a ray of hope to shareholders who should be staring into the abyss.
Previous interventions have preserved the solvency of the underlying institutions but crushed shareholders. Hank “Hammer” Paulson hammered them into dust. Not so the rescue of Citigroup.
The important part of the agreement is the government’s guarantee of Citigroup’s $306 billion in dodgy mortgage assets. In return for a mere $7 billion in preferred stock, the government will take 90% of any loss (and there will be plenty of losses) after Citigroup absorbs the first $29 billion.
The news has propelled Citigroup’s stock to a spectacular gain today…up more than 55% as we type this entry.
This time, the government has let shareholders keep Citigroup, unlike previous interventions at AIG, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.
An AIG shareholder, for example, who went to sleep on Tuesday, Sept. 16, 2008 woke up the next day to learn she owned 1/5th of what she had the day before. Overnight, the government had taken 80% of the company’s equity in exchange for an $85 billion loan with an interest rate that bordered on usurious. If that wasn’t harsh enough, AIG had to pay interest on the entire credit line whether it borrowed the money or not. The “juice would run,” as they say on the Sopranos, on the full amount.
At the time, Wonk the Plank applauded these “delighfully stiff” terms (though they were toned down in October). Government takeovers should be extremely unattractive to shareholders and companies.
Why is the latest bailout so troubling to Wonk the Plank? It suggests yet another twist to the government’s efforts to stabilize the markets. The key to stability, we think, is to eliminate the pie-in-the-sky mentality from company boardrooms. Once they understand that vast sums of money aren’t just going to rain down from heaven, they will be more inclined to make the difficult choices that will get them back on track.
So we are alarmed at the mixed signals the latest intervention sends to the markets. It’s a big step backward, all in the name of goosing err…calming…the stock market.
More and more we have been seeing pundits and even respectable news organizations attribute price movements in the Dow Jones Average as the market’s ebullience or dismay with the various policy options on the table. The “wisdom of the market” is not nearly so farsighted, we would caution.
The market is not applauding a prudent governmental solution to all that ails it. It didn’t rally because it saw the light at the end of the fiscal crisis tunnel. It is a simpler beast than that. It jumped because it heard the sweet squeak of the money spigot being turned on.



Posted by wonktheplank
Posted by wonktheplank 
Posted by wonktheplank